FOREfront--Working for the People of Roseville

Volume 02, Issue 4, July 1999

LAND DEVELOPMENT PROCESS – A GLITCH

By and large the approval system for land development in Roseville works. From the time a developer notifies the planning department of a proposed project to hearings before the Design Review/Planning Commissions or city council, every effort is made to inform people and affected neighborhoods. Any person can question and comment on the project.

The approval system to that point works quite well. THEN comes the GLITCH. Although a public hearing notice is mailed to every property owner within 300’ and published in The Press-Tribune 10 days prior to the meeting, the staff report is not available until 4:00 p.m. Friday before the public meeting. No one should be expected to absorb and digest the staff report in the four to five days before the meeting. If a Neighborhood Association has concerns about the project, it is hard pressed to get its members together to go over the report and to prepare for the meeting. Individuals who may have a concern also do not have enough time to research, study and prepare for the meeting.

A staff report available two weeks before the meeting would be reasonable. Also, there is not enough time allotted for the public to discuss projects at those meetings. Individual members of the public are limited to five minutes while people representing groups’ of citizens may be given more time. Developers however, are most often given unlimited time. Where is the fairness? We all realize that the city is under pressure to approve developments. What happens then is that the concerns of the public are put aside or ignored. To rush approval of development at the expense of citizen input and concerns is not in the best interest of the community. Too bad if developers can’t get action on their projects quickly; they should "take a number and get in line." Most of the developers are out of towners and there should be no rush to help them to the detriment of current residents. ELIMINATE the GLITCH.

SUIT AGAINST CITY’S FEES – ALIVE AND WELL

The City has retained a Sacramento law firm to fight the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association law suit regarding the 4% "In Lieu Franchise Fee" charged on your water, sewer, and trash bill which is transferred into the general fund. The lawsuit is based on the city’s non-compliance with Proposition 218, the Right to Vote on Taxes Act.

The Sacramento law firm has filed in court to set aside the Jarvis complaint contending that Proposition 218 does not apply to Roseville. The hearing is set for August 10th. Jarvis is confident their original complaint will prevail in court.

"The mighty oak was once a little nut that stood its ground." (Author unknown)

"COMMON SENSE WORKS"

Where have you heard the saying "common sense works?" It was a campaign slogan of a candidate for the Roseville council last year. Was the slogan meant only for the candidate or was it meant for all those now serving on the council?

Whether individually or collectively, common sense evidently is eluding our council members.

Four cases in point. More could be cited but you will get the point.

First case. The racquet-ball court on Brisa Ribera Court. Common sense tells you the building is too big, out of place and would be a nuisance. The vast majority of the residents at a council meeting emphasized that. The over 100 residents at the meeting lost.

Second Case. Over development on the Northeast corner of Riverside and Cirby. The council voted for the developer, totally disregarding traffic concerns of the Cresthaven neighborhood. One planning commissioner called that intersection a "festering sore." That sore is to be made worse by the city’s proposed three left turns from north-bound Riverside onto west-bound Cirby and two right turn lanes from east-bound Cirby onto Riverside. The new lanes are modeled after the Fair Oaks and Watt Avenue intersection – the seventh most dangerous intersection in the nation, according to a recent State Farm Insurance Company study. Riverside-Cirby is now near total failure. Common sense took a bad turn.

Third case. Development on the Southeast corner of Pleasant Grove and Foothills Blvd (Arbor View). The Northwest Roseville Specific Plan(NWRSP) for that location states "… the intent is to provide a cluster of small buildings that fit the landscape and provide a ‘village setting.’ It also states "Buildings shall generally be limited to not more than 6,000 square feet and that buildings shall not be more than two (2) stories in height." The council threw common sense out the third story window by approving two 40,000 plus square foot buildings, one which common sense is a three-story building (an underground parking garage whose height is half way above ground). Evidently the council not only threw out common sense but also can not read since the NWRSP is easy to read and the INTENT is spelled out. The neighborhood lost to the developer.

Fourth case. The council restricted public discussion at a council meeting to alleged vandalism. To wit: Painting a non existant curb red and painting out a parking space marker which were not part of an agenda. The city staff prepared a 52-page report that backed up what the discussion was to encompass; however, the public was restricted to discussing only the painted red curb and painting out of a parking space marker. Common sense tells us that if you have an agenda item with a 52-page report the public has a right to address the entire issue as noted on the agenda. The majority of residents who spoke on the issue lost. However, the court has ruled "… discussion was held on a matter not noted on the agenda to wit, their vandalism of property." That means the council violated the Brown Act.

As we total the large number of residents that "common sense" has recently pushed aside, we see that the taxpaying voting public has lost control of the instrument (city council) they created. Sadly, most of the losses are in favor of development.

"We thought, because we had power, we had wisdom." (Stephen Vincent Benet)

ROSEVILLE’s HOME REPAIR PROGRAMS FOR LOW INCOME SENIORS

Government rules, at times, are complex or confusing, especially to our seniors. Are you a low income senior citizen over 62 years of age who needs repairs to rehabilitation program which may help you. FORE, working with the Roseville Housing and Redevelopment department on behalf of a senior citizen, has found that the program in understandable when taken one part at a time.

All parts of the program are separate and each may be used to have repairs made to your electrical, plumbing, roofing, doors, etc.

Part one is the Handyman Program. It is FREE. Call 782-6247 for what can be done.

Part two is a GRANT of up to $5,000.00 for repairs the Handyman Program can not take care of. The grant is FREE. Call 774-5270 for details.

Part three is a rehabilitation (repair) loan. You can get up to $40,000.00 at 3% interest for 15 years. A deferred loan of up to $40,000.00 at 0% interest is available if you own and occupy the home and is due upon sale of the home. The loans are secured by a Deed of Trust. Call 774-5270 for your options. There is a waiting list for grants and/or loans.

You would have to decide if you want, in effect, to mortgage your home to get such loans. From people we have spoken to, the Handyman Program and grant program usually are enough. So judge carefully your needs and your options. Call 774-5270 for more information.

Seniors will be pleased Roseville is taking confusion out of a program for them.

HOSPITAL GRANTS FUND

The city council has indicated that city departments’ projects should be funded by general funds, not by the hospital grants fund. We applaud that. They also will amend the ordinance the Grants Advisory Commission follows to specify how the fund interest not granted can be rolled over to another year and to determine the eligibility and worthiness of those applying for grants. We applaud that too.

FORE’s position, articulated the past two years, is that hospital grant money not be used for projects the city should fund. The reason is there is more than enough general funds money to cover such projects. Last year the city had $11 million more general fund money than needed for police, fire, library, parks and recreation and general government operations. Money going from the hospital grant fund into city projects means more money for city buildings. We believe that actually is "laundering" the hospital funds.

People tell us that they want to have a say on how excess general funds are used since most of that money comes from "In Lieu of Franchise Fees" and "Utility Users’ Taxes."

A quote for the 1990’s. "If you don’t like the road you’re on, find another road home." Harry Crabb, Jr, Roseville City Mayor

MAIDU INDIAN CASINO

The Maidu Indians propose to build a casino near the Northwest Roseville city limits. The Woodcreek Oaks Neighborhood Association discussed the proposed facility at a recent meeting with county supervisor Bill Santucci and Roseville councilmenber Dan Goodhall.

It is apparent from that meeting that each person in Roseville will have his/her opinion about Indian gaming facilities, from the impacts they cause to where they should be located.

FORE plans to hold a forum August 31st at Roseville’s Channel 8 to bring together all parties to air the issue. FORE will ask the City of Roseville, the county Board of Supervisors or Borders Committee, a community representative, a Maidu Indian and Bureau of Indian Affairs representative to participate. It will be an opportunity to base good decisions on sound information rather than on emotions.

People need to be aware of some facts as they personally decide on this issue:

*Gaming is a legal and legitimate business in California.

*Proposition 5 passed overwhelmingly (67%) in last year’s election.
*The Maidu tribe has a legal right to build their casino in
Placer County.

*Neither the county nor the cities can approve or disapprove the casino.

*Of the 140 + people at the Woodcreek Oaks Neighborhood Association meeting, 93.1% opposed the casino, according to Jeanine Lendl, president.

While the county and Roseville are cooperatively negotiating with the tribe in the best interests of nearby communities, public awareness is the best guard against emotional decision making. Facts and figures on similarly placed casinos are needed. The forum should provide them.

FORE FUND RAISING

The response to help at our Downtown Tuesday Night booth has been outstanding. A crew sets up at 3:00 pm and others take over to barbeque, prepare food and sell to the public. We have had no less than 14 people helping each Tuesday. It is a fun evening with everyone pitching in. Everyone is thanked for their help. People who say they can not stand too long take the cashier’s job, then to their surprise they are at the counter to serve the very friendly hungry and thirsty people.

If you haven’t been called to volunteer, don’t feel slighted. Call 784-1907 and Lucia will gladly give you an assignment. You would be surprised at the nice people you will meet. Most of those people show a genuine interest in FORE when they receive our literature and a number of people have become members on the spot. Come and have fun with us.

"Every truth has two sides, it is well to look at both, before we commit ourselves to either." (Aesop)

UTILITY RATES/ISSUES

TRASH (GARBAGE): This July the city council approved a 7% increase in your trash (garbage) bill (nearly $1.25 per month). While regrettable, FORE believes the increase is justified and did not oppose it. This increase is expected to hold rates level for the next 2 to 3 years. Each of us can help keep costs down by recycling newspapers, junk mail and cardboard in the Roseville recycling bins. Call 774-5780 for the bin nearest you. Recycling newspapers is the politically correct thing to do and the $4.50 saved by the 100 lbs make it also economically correct. That is money your trash department would pay out when they haul the newspapers to the landfill.

ELECTRIC BILL RATE RESTRUCTURED. The council also approved staff’s recommendation this July which eliminated the winter and summer rates, creating a single year round rate. The impact to your total annual cost should be the same unless you increase or decrease your usage for the year.

"UNBUNDLING" YOUR ELECTRIC BILL. The council rejected a suggestion by a FORE representative and approved "UNBUNDLING" as recommended by staff and the Roseville Public Utilities Commission (PUC). Staff and the PUC recommended five areas to be shown on your bill as we explained in our May FOREfront newsletter. Those were A fixed customer charge, a distribution charge, an energy charge, a competitive transition charge and a public benefit charge.

Embedded in the distribution charge is the 4% "In Lieu Franchise Fee" and an approximate 2% fee for maintenance and operation of street lights and signal lights. Of course, you pay a 5% utility users tax on those fees. Your real tax (fee and taxes) on your electric bill is – 11.5%. Council rejected the request that these two "fees" be taken out of the distribution charge and be listed separately. After all, they have nothing to do with the cost of providing distribution of ELECTRICITY. Is it to keep you ignorant of the true taxes you pay?

Do you have questions/comments on utility issues? Call/FAX Fred at 782-9349.

NEWSLETTER DISTRIBUTION LIST: If you receive a newsletter addressed to you personally, you are one of many people FORE believes is concerned about Roseville. The cost of the newsletter is borne by FORE members. We would like you to continue to receive the newsletter because we feel the issues we write about are the issues you are concerned about and want to know what is being done about them.

It would be great if you became a FORE member, but should you just want the newsletter, we ask that you make a nominal donation to cover the cost. Please send your donation to: FORE, 305 Hemphill Way, Roseville, CA 95678.

FORE’S TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE

While roads and roadway intersections are high priority items for the committee, they are working on two other important issues: commuter rail and railroad crossing safety.

The California High Speed Rail Authority will be deciding on the routes of the future high speed trains in California. As we noted in our last newsletter, it is certain that Sacramento will be one starting point and end destination. The train routes and trains will be costly. However, both will come within the next 20 years. Therefore, it is not too early for Roseville and Placer County to start planning for a rapid train to Sacramento, not a slow light rail. Cars are taken off highways when people have a "cost effective" alternative. Call Darwin at 771-5716 for information.

Rail crossing safety is tied in with train horns and whistles. You do not need trains to sound their horns and whistles when railroad crossings are impenetrable. Drivers who zigzag through the single arms at crossings place themselves and the railroad in jeopardy. Quad arm barriers prevent drivers from circumventing the crossing. Two things then happen. Drivers are safe and the whistles and horns don’t need to be sounded – security and tranquility. Contact Judy at 783-3570 for an update.

CAMPAIGN REFORM. Council member Randy Graham said he was appalled by the large campaign contributions most candidates got this last election. He wants to address campaign reform. A few years ago Harry Crabb also wanted campaign contribution reform. Maybe Graham needs to look at the record on what was instituted, because Crabb has changed his mind about campaign money.

Copyright 1999 FORE, Roseville, CA

WORKING FOR THE PEOPLE OF ROSEVILLE

HOME | FOREfront | CONTACTS

FORE, 305 Hemphill Way, Roseville, CA 95678

916-783-9891 or 916-783-7632 FAX 916-783-9349

info@friendsofroseville.org

Friends of Roseville is a non-profit, non-political, tax exempt 501 ( c ) 3 organization.